traxys/tree-sitter
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

🎨

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Max Brunsfeld 2016-11-18 16:16:51 -08:00
parent 5924285e69
commit 42ba70a5a0
1 changed files with 21 additions and 25 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

46
spec/integration/compile_grammar_spec.cc
View file

@ -83,25 +83,23 @@ describe("compile_grammar", []() {
{"math_operation_prec_type", "PREC"}
}).c_str());
AssertThat(result.error_message, Equals(dedent(
R"MESSAGE(
Unresolved conflict for symbol sequence:
AssertThat(result.error_message, Equals(dedent(R"MESSAGE(
Unresolved conflict for symbol sequence:
expression '+' expression • '+' …
expression '+' expression • '+' …
Possible interpretations:
Possible interpretations:
(math_operation expression '+' expression) • '+' …
(math_operation expression '+' expression) • '+' …
expression '+' (math_operation expression • '+' expression)
expression '+' (math_operation expression • '+' expression)
Possible resolutions:
Possible resolutions:
Specify left or right associativity in the rules: math_operation
Specify left or right associativity in the rules: math_operation
Add a conflict for the rules: math_operation
)MESSAGE"
)));
Add a conflict for the rules: math_operation
)MESSAGE")));
result = ts_compile_grammar(fill_template(grammar_template, {
{"math_operation_prec_type", "PREC_LEFT"}
@ -196,27 +194,25 @@ describe("compile_grammar", []() {
{"function_call_precedence", "0"}
}).c_str());
AssertThat(result.error_message, Equals(dedent(
R"MESSAGE(
Unresolved conflict for symbol sequence:
AssertThat(result.error_message, Equals(dedent(R"MESSAGE(
Unresolved conflict for symbol sequence:
identifier • '{' …
identifier • '{' …
Possible interpretations:
Possible interpretations:
(expression identifier) • '{' …
(expression identifier) • '{' …
(function_call identifier • block)
(function_call identifier • block)
Possible resolutions:
Possible resolutions:
Use different precedences in the rules: expression function_call
Use different precedences in the rules: expression function_call
Specify left or right associativity in the rules: expression
Specify left or right associativity in the rules: expression
Add a conflict for the rules: expression function_call
)MESSAGE"
)));
Add a conflict for the rules: expression function_call
)MESSAGE")));
// Giving function calls lower precedence than expressions causes `bar`
// to be treated as an expression passed to `foo`, not as a function