fix: deprecate child_containing_descendant and add child_with_descendant instead
This commit is contained in:
parent
2e3504a422
commit
934a2814fd
5 changed files with 91 additions and 30 deletions
|
|
@ -550,16 +550,54 @@ TSNode ts_node_parent(TSNode self) {
|
|||
|
||||
while (true) {
|
||||
TSNode next_node = ts_node_child_containing_descendant(node, self);
|
||||
if (next_node.id == self.id) break;
|
||||
if (ts_node_is_null(next_node)) break;
|
||||
node = next_node;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return node;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TSNode ts_node_child_containing_descendant(TSNode self, TSNode subnode) {
|
||||
uint32_t start_byte = ts_node_start_byte(subnode);
|
||||
uint32_t end_byte = ts_node_end_byte(subnode);
|
||||
TSNode ts_node_child_containing_descendant(TSNode self, TSNode descendant) {
|
||||
uint32_t start_byte = ts_node_start_byte(descendant);
|
||||
uint32_t end_byte = ts_node_end_byte(descendant);
|
||||
|
||||
do {
|
||||
NodeChildIterator iter = ts_node_iterate_children(&self);
|
||||
do {
|
||||
if (
|
||||
!ts_node_child_iterator_next(&iter, &self)
|
||||
|| ts_node_start_byte(self) > start_byte
|
||||
|| self.id == descendant.id
|
||||
) {
|
||||
return ts_node__null();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Here we check the current self node and *all* of its zero-width token siblings that follow.
|
||||
// If any of these nodes contain the target subnode, we return that node. Otherwise, we restore the node we started at
|
||||
// for the loop condition, and that will continue with the next *non-zero-width* sibling.
|
||||
TSNode old = self;
|
||||
// While the next sibling is a zero-width token
|
||||
while (ts_node_child_iterator_next_sibling_is_empty_adjacent(&iter, self)) {
|
||||
TSNode current_node = ts_node_child_containing_descendant(self, descendant);
|
||||
// If the target child is in self, return it
|
||||
if (!ts_node_is_null(current_node)) {
|
||||
return current_node;
|
||||
}
|
||||
ts_node_child_iterator_next(&iter, &self);
|
||||
if (self.id == descendant.id) {
|
||||
return ts_node__null();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
self = old;
|
||||
} while (iter.position.bytes < end_byte || ts_node_child_count(self) == 0);
|
||||
} while (!ts_node__is_relevant(self, true));
|
||||
|
||||
return self;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TSNode ts_node_child_with_descendant(TSNode self, TSNode descendant) {
|
||||
uint32_t start_byte = ts_node_start_byte(descendant);
|
||||
uint32_t end_byte = ts_node_end_byte(descendant);
|
||||
|
||||
do {
|
||||
NodeChildIterator iter = ts_node_iterate_children(&self);
|
||||
|
|
@ -570,7 +608,7 @@ TSNode ts_node_child_containing_descendant(TSNode self, TSNode subnode) {
|
|||
) {
|
||||
return ts_node__null();
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (self.id == subnode.id) {
|
||||
if (self.id == descendant.id) {
|
||||
return self;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -580,13 +618,13 @@ TSNode ts_node_child_containing_descendant(TSNode self, TSNode subnode) {
|
|||
TSNode old = self;
|
||||
// While the next sibling is a zero-width token
|
||||
while (ts_node_child_iterator_next_sibling_is_empty_adjacent(&iter, self)) {
|
||||
TSNode current_node = ts_node_child_containing_descendant(self, subnode);
|
||||
TSNode current_node = ts_node_child_with_descendant(self, descendant);
|
||||
// If the target child is in self, return it
|
||||
if (!ts_node_is_null(current_node)) {
|
||||
return current_node;
|
||||
}
|
||||
ts_node_child_iterator_next(&iter, &self);
|
||||
if (self.id == subnode.id) {
|
||||
if (self.id == descendant.id) {
|
||||
return self;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue