tree-sitter/spec/compiler/build_tables/conflict_manager_spec.cc
2014-04-10 08:38:14 -07:00

110 lines
No EOL
4.2 KiB
C++

#include "compiler_spec_helper.h"
#include "compiler/build_tables/conflict_manager.h"
using namespace rules;
using namespace build_tables;
START_TEST
describe("resolving parse conflicts", []() {
bool should_update;
ConflictManager *manager;
PreparedGrammar parse_grammar({
{ "rule1", seq({ sym("rule2"), sym("token2") }) },
{ "rule2", sym("token1") },
}, {});
PreparedGrammar lex_grammar({
{ "token1", pattern("[a-c]") },
{ "token2", pattern("[b-d]") },
}, {});
before_each([&]() {
manager = new ConflictManager(parse_grammar, lex_grammar, {
{ Symbol("rule1"), "rule1" },
{ Symbol("rule2"), "rule2" },
{ Symbol("token1"), "token1" },
{ Symbol("token2"), "token2" },
});
});
after_each([&]() {
delete manager;
});
describe("lexical conflicts", [&]() {
Symbol sym1("token1");
Symbol sym2("token2");
it("favors non-errors over lexical errors", [&]() {
should_update = manager->resolve_lex_action(LexAction::Error(), LexAction::Advance(2));
AssertThat(should_update, IsTrue());
should_update = manager->resolve_lex_action(LexAction::Advance(2), LexAction::Error());
AssertThat(should_update, IsFalse());
});
it("prefers tokens that are listed earlier in the grammar", [&]() {
should_update = manager->resolve_lex_action(LexAction::Accept(sym1), LexAction::Accept(sym2));
AssertThat(should_update, IsFalse());
should_update = manager->resolve_lex_action(LexAction::Accept(sym2), LexAction::Accept(sym1));
AssertThat(should_update, IsTrue());
});
});
describe("syntactic conflicts", [&]() {
Symbol sym1("rule1");
Symbol sym2("rule2");
it("favors non-errors over parse errors", [&]() {
should_update = manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, ParseAction::Error(), ParseAction::Shift(2));
AssertThat(should_update, IsTrue());
should_update = manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, ParseAction::Shift(2), ParseAction::Error());
AssertThat(should_update, IsFalse());
});
describe("shift/reduce conflicts", [&]() {
it("records a conflict", [&]() {
manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, ParseAction::Reduce(sym2, 1), ParseAction::Shift(2));
manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, ParseAction::Shift(2), ParseAction::Reduce(sym2, 1));
AssertThat(manager->conflicts(), Equals(vector<Conflict>({
Conflict("rule1: shift / reduce rule2")
})));
});
it("favors the shift", [&]() {
should_update = manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, ParseAction::Reduce(sym2, 1), ParseAction::Shift(2));
AssertThat(should_update, IsTrue());
should_update = manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, ParseAction::Shift(2), ParseAction::Reduce(sym2, 1));
AssertThat(should_update, IsFalse());
});
});
describe("reduce/reduce conflicts", [&]() {
it("records a conflict", [&]() {
manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, ParseAction::Reduce(sym2, 1), ParseAction::Reduce(sym1, 1));
manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, ParseAction::Reduce(sym1, 1), ParseAction::Reduce(sym2, 1));
AssertThat(manager->conflicts(), Equals(vector<Conflict>({
Conflict("rule1: reduce rule2 / reduce rule1"),
Conflict("rule1: reduce rule1 / reduce rule2")
})));
});
it("favors the symbol listed earlier in the grammar", [&]() {
should_update = manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, ParseAction::Reduce(sym2, 1), ParseAction::Reduce(sym1, 1));
AssertThat(should_update, IsTrue());
should_update = manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, ParseAction::Reduce(sym1, 1), ParseAction::Reduce(sym2, 1));
AssertThat(should_update, IsFalse());
});
});
});
});
END_TEST