tree-sitter/spec/compiler/build_tables/conflict_manager_spec.cc
2014-09-09 13:01:18 -07:00

226 lines
8.3 KiB
C++

#include "compiler/compiler_spec_helper.h"
#include "compiler/rules/built_in_symbols.h"
#include "compiler/build_tables/parse_conflict_manager.h"
#include "compiler/build_tables/lex_conflict_manager.h"
#include "compiler/prepared_grammar.h"
using namespace rules;
using namespace build_tables;
START_TEST
describe("resolving parse conflicts", []() {
bool update;
SyntaxGrammar parse_grammar({
{ "rule1", seq({ sym("rule2"), sym("token2") }) },
{ "rule2", sym("token1") },
}, {}, set<rules::Symbol>());
LexicalGrammar lex_grammar({
{ "token1", pattern("[a-c]") },
{ "token2", pattern("[b-d]") },
{ "token3", keyword("stuff") },
}, {}, {});
describe("LexConflictManager", [&]() {
Symbol sym1(0, SymbolOptionToken);
Symbol sym2(1, SymbolOptionToken);
Symbol sym3(2, SymbolOptionToken);
LexConflictManager *manager;
before_each([&]() {
manager = new LexConflictManager(lex_grammar);
});
after_each([&]() {
delete manager;
});
it("favors non-errors over lexical errors", [&]() {
update = manager->resolve_lex_action(LexAction::Error(), LexAction::Advance(2, {0}));
AssertThat(update, IsTrue());
update = manager->resolve_lex_action(LexAction::Advance(2, {0}), LexAction::Error());
AssertThat(update, IsFalse());
});
describe("accept-token/advance conflicts", [&]() {
it("prefers the advance", [&]() {
update = manager->resolve_lex_action(LexAction::Accept(sym3, 3), LexAction::Advance(1, { 0 }));
AssertThat(update, IsTrue());
update = manager->resolve_lex_action(LexAction::Advance(1, { 0 }), LexAction::Accept(sym3, 3));
AssertThat(update, IsFalse());
});
});
describe("accept-token/accept-token conflicts", [&]() {
describe("when one token has a higher precedence than the other", [&]() {
it("prefers the token with the higher precedence", [&]() {
update = manager->resolve_lex_action(LexAction::Accept(sym3, 2), LexAction::Accept(sym2, 0));
AssertThat(update, IsFalse());
update = manager->resolve_lex_action(LexAction::Accept(sym2, 0), LexAction::Accept(sym3, 2));
AssertThat(update, IsTrue());
});
});
describe("when both tokens have the same precedence", [&]() {
it("prefers the token listed earlier in the grammar", [&]() {
update = manager->resolve_lex_action(LexAction::Accept(sym1, 0), LexAction::Accept(sym2, 0));
AssertThat(update, IsFalse());
update = manager->resolve_lex_action(LexAction::Accept(sym2, 0), LexAction::Accept(sym1, 0));
AssertThat(update, IsTrue());
});
});
});
});
describe("ParseConflictManager", [&]() {
Symbol sym1(0);
Symbol sym2(1);
ParseConflictManager *manager;
before_each([&]() {
manager = new ParseConflictManager(parse_grammar, lex_grammar);
});
after_each([&]() {
delete manager;
});
it("favors non-errors over parse errors", [&]() {
update = manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, ParseAction::Error(), ParseAction::Shift(2, { 0 }));
AssertThat(update, IsTrue());
update = manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, ParseAction::Shift(2, { 0 }), ParseAction::Error());
AssertThat(update, IsFalse());
});
describe("shift/reduce conflicts", [&]() {
describe("when the shift has higher precedence", [&]() {
ParseAction shift = ParseAction::Shift(2, { 3 });
ParseAction reduce = ParseAction::Reduce(sym2, 1, 1);
it("does not record a conflict", [&]() {
manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, shift, reduce);
manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, reduce, shift);
AssertThat(manager->conflicts(), IsEmpty());
});
it("favors the shift", [&]() {
AssertThat(manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, shift, reduce), IsFalse());
AssertThat(manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, reduce, shift), IsTrue());
});
});
describe("when the reduce has higher precedence", [&]() {
ParseAction shift = ParseAction::Shift(2, { 1 });
ParseAction reduce = ParseAction::Reduce(sym2, 1, 3);
it("does not record a conflict", [&]() {
manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, reduce, shift);
manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, shift, reduce);
AssertThat(manager->conflicts(), IsEmpty());
});
it("favors the reduce", [&]() {
AssertThat(manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, reduce, shift), IsFalse());
AssertThat(manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, shift, reduce), IsTrue());
});
});
describe("when the precedences are equal", [&]() {
ParseAction shift = ParseAction::Shift(2, { 0 });
ParseAction reduce = ParseAction::Reduce(sym2, 1, 0);
it("records a conflict", [&]() {
manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, reduce, shift);
manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, shift, reduce);
AssertThat(manager->conflicts(), Equals(vector<Conflict>({
Conflict("rule1: shift (precedence 0) / reduce rule2 (precedence 0)")
})));
});
it("favors the shift", [&]() {
AssertThat(manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, shift, reduce), IsFalse());
AssertThat(manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, reduce, shift), IsTrue());
});
describe("when the symbols is a built-in symbol", [&]() {
it("records a conflict", [&]() {
manager->resolve_parse_action(rules::ERROR(), reduce, shift);
AssertThat(manager->conflicts()[0], Equals(
Conflict("ERROR: shift (precedence 0) / reduce rule2 (precedence 0)")
));
manager->resolve_parse_action(rules::END_OF_INPUT(), reduce, shift);
AssertThat(manager->conflicts()[1], Equals(
Conflict("END_OF_INPUT: shift (precedence 0) / reduce rule2 (precedence 0)")
));
});
});
});
describe("when the shift has conflicting precedences compared to the reduce", [&]() {
ParseAction shift = ParseAction::Shift(2, { 0, 1, 3 });
ParseAction reduce = ParseAction::Reduce(sym2, 1, 2);
it("records a conflict", [&]() {
manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, reduce, shift);
manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, shift, reduce);
AssertThat(manager->conflicts(), Equals(vector<Conflict>({
Conflict("rule1: shift (precedence 0, 1, 3) / reduce rule2 (precedence 2)")
})));
});
it("favors the shift", [&]() {
AssertThat(manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, shift, reduce), IsFalse());
AssertThat(manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, reduce, shift), IsTrue());
});
});
});
describe("reduce/reduce conflicts", [&]() {
describe("when one action has higher precedence", [&]() {
ParseAction left = ParseAction::Reduce(sym2, 1, 0);
ParseAction right = ParseAction::Reduce(sym2, 1, 3);
it("favors that action", [&]() {
AssertThat(manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, left, right), IsTrue());
AssertThat(manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, right, left), IsFalse());
});
it("does not record a conflict", [&]() {
manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, left, right);
manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, right, left);
AssertThat(manager->conflicts(), IsEmpty());
});
});
describe("when the actions have the same precedence", [&]() {
ParseAction left = ParseAction::Reduce(sym1, 1, 0);
ParseAction right = ParseAction::Reduce(sym2, 1, 0);
it("favors the symbol listed earlier in the grammar", [&]() {
AssertThat(manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, right, left), IsTrue());
AssertThat(manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, left, right), IsFalse());
});
it("records a conflict", [&]() {
manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, left, right);
manager->resolve_parse_action(sym1, right, left);
AssertThat(manager->conflicts(), Equals(vector<Conflict>({
Conflict("rule1: reduce rule2 (precedence 0) / reduce rule1 (precedence 0)"),
Conflict("rule1: reduce rule1 (precedence 0) / reduce rule2 (precedence 0)")
})));
});
});
});
});
});
END_TEST