Recently I've been pulling a lot of grammars into GitHub's highlighting backend, replacing legacy language support with tree-sitter highlighting queries. Our backend systems have a standard set of highlight captures we expect, very similar to the standard tagging captures we expect. Though end-user applications are free to choose whatever tagging nomenclature they want, I think it's nice to include a checking stage that will help us ensure that we know whether a capture might be recognized or not. It will also help us figure out where we need to expand our standard set of captures (see #1539). |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| generate | ||
| tests | ||
| highlight.rs | ||
| lib.rs | ||
| logger.rs | ||
| main.rs | ||
| parse.rs | ||
| playground.html | ||
| playground.rs | ||
| query.rs | ||
| query_testing.rs | ||
| tags.rs | ||
| test.rs | ||
| test_highlight.rs | ||
| test_tags.rs | ||
| util.rs | ||
| wasm.rs | ||