cb58bc593f
Recently I've been pulling a lot of grammars into GitHub's highlighting backend, replacing legacy language support with tree-sitter highlighting queries. Our backend systems have a standard set of highlight captures we expect, very similar to the standard tagging captures we expect. Though end-user applications are free to choose whatever tagging nomenclature they want, I think it's nice to include a checking stage that will help us ensure that we know whether a capture might be recognized or not. It will also help us figure out where we need to expand our standard set of captures (see #1539).
27 lines
650 B
TOML
27 lines
650 B
TOML
[package]
|
|
name = "tree-sitter-highlight"
|
|
description = "Library for performing syntax highlighting with Tree-sitter"
|
|
version = "0.20.2"
|
|
authors = [
|
|
"Max Brunsfeld <maxbrunsfeld@gmail.com>",
|
|
"Tim Clem <timothy.clem@gmail.com>",
|
|
]
|
|
license = "MIT"
|
|
readme = "README.md"
|
|
edition = "2018"
|
|
keywords = ["incremental", "parsing", "syntax", "highlighting"]
|
|
categories = ["parsing", "text-editors"]
|
|
repository = "https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter"
|
|
rust-version.workspace = true
|
|
|
|
[lib]
|
|
crate-type = ["lib", "staticlib"]
|
|
|
|
[dependencies]
|
|
lazy_static = "1.2.0"
|
|
regex = "1"
|
|
thiserror = "1.0"
|
|
|
|
[dependencies.tree-sitter]
|
|
version = "0.20"
|
|
path = "../lib"
|